We don't all have time to become experts in Critical Theory, and that's okay! This blog can help you understand theory in an easy, modern day way. You may not be an expert, but you'll definitely have a better understanding walking out than you did when you came in. So stick around and see what you can learn!
Tuesday, December 8, 2015
Thank You
With the semester coming to an end, I wanted to take a moment to thank you guys for following me through the various theories you'll need to be a literary critic. This blog covered theories including:
New Criticism
Reader Response
Feminism
Structuralism
Post Structuralism
Queer Theory
Psychoanalysis
New Historicism
and Postcolonialism
I attempted to explain these theories in the simplest terms possible while still covering the basic points you would need to know for each one of them. Hopefully, the blogs helped some of you out. Theory can be tough to grasp and even tougher to fully understand, but it just takes a bit of time and research to accomplish.
But if you're like most people and you don't have the time to become an absolute expert in Critical Theory, that's okay, too. Just take a trip back to this blog and brush up on the things you really need to know. Eventually, you'll be analyzing like a professional.
Citations:
"Thankyou." Flickr. Yahoo!, n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <https://www.flickr.com/photos/signote/6102820227>.
Queer Reading of Peter Pan
Nichole Currier
Robin DeRosa
Critical Theory
8 December 2015
Peter
Pan
Peter
Pan is a classic tale that has been retold through books, movies, and various
stage productions. Focusing on a young boy who refuses to grow up and lives in
the magical world of Neverland, Peter Pan is a story that never grows old. Just
because the plot has stuck around for generations, however, does not mean the
theories have all been figured out. While Peter Pan can seem like a simple
story of coming to terms with adulthood on the outside, it poses much more
meaning when seen through the lens of Queer Theory. When focusing on the fact
that in nearly every stage production of this story Peter is played by a girl,
one can see how this idea changed the entire meaning of numerous other parts of
the story. Peter’s interactions with those in Neverland, as well as his
interactions with Wendy, take on a whole new meaning than they previously had. Peter Pan refers heavily to the
homosexuality between women.
Shannon
Keating points out in her paper Peter
Pan, Queer Icon that in every Broadway musical rendition of this show,
Peter has been played by a female. She goes on to discuss how “what has become
a casting custom holds more value than simply that of tradition” (Keating). She
discusses how this practice is hardly ever done in other shows, movies, or
theater productions. Women being cast as boys “remains almost as infrequent a
cultural occurrence in modern media as it was 50-plus years ago” (Keating). The
fact that this is an occurrence that has come across not once, not two times,
but every time Peter Pan has been performed is to be taken into consideration
when analyzing other aspects of the story.
When
viewing Peter Pan as a boy with masculine features, many aspects of the book
take on completely new meanings. Keating discusses how, in the world of
Neverland, genders are split almost directly down the middle. Boys, such as the
pirates and Lost Boys of the land, are constantly going on adventures and
fighting with one another. The girls, however, such as the mermaids and Tiger
Lily, do little more than admire Peter and the many things he accomplishes.
Even Wendy is seen solely as a girlish, mother figure throughout the entire
series. On the outside, it seems as though women are given no more thought or
purpose than absolutely necessary. When viewing Peter as his female part in
theatrical productions, however, these roles of other women take on a whole new
meaning. “Women playing those Peter Pans, at least, present the possibility
that not only can anyone be
Peter—anyone can fall in love with him, too” (Keating). By having a girl play
Peter Pan and continue with the flirtatious banter that is passed between the
mermaids, Tiger Lily, and Wendy the message becomes clear that gender is not
the defining factor in who falls for who in this series. While Peter may still
hold some masculine qualities, the fact that he is played by a female is the
defining point in what pushes this story towards a queer analysis.
Peter
is not the only character in the story that possess the body of a female and
the traits of a male, though. Taking a look at Peter’s right hand side kick,
one can see how many of these boyish traits are reflected in Tinker Bell, as
well. While still curvy and flirtatious as many femme fatale characters are,
Tinker Bell holds a strong will, a malicious mind set, and the quickest temper
of anyone else in the story. These are traits that are often linked to men,
while women are viewed as the nurturing, level headed, and obedient characters—such
as Wendy. Tinker Bell goes against these stereotypes, however, and even goes so
far as to push the binaries farther with who is allowed to fall in love with
the female version of Peter Pan. Towards the end of the story, when pirates set
to poison Peter without him knowing, Tinker Bell goes out of her way to warn
him and even drinks the poison herself when he does not understand. Peter
immediately breaks down crying, showing how much he cares for his small female
friend and goes to great lengths to bring her back. The actions from both of
these characters show the deep devotion they have for each other, a
relationship deeper than that of many other characters in the story. The fact
that they both also happen to be female in practically every theatrical production
simply adds to the homosexual undertones that can be seen here.
While
Peter Pan may not seem like any other heterosexual story on the outside, it’s
clear that there are numerous homosexual undertones in various aspects of this
story. By casting Peter as a girl in theatrical productions, one can see the
homosexual feelings that drive him towards nearly ever other female character
in the show. His interactions with the mermaids, Tiger Lily, Wendy, and Tinker
Bell take on a whole new meaning than they previously had. Even Tinker Bell
herself shows these binary breaking traits by possessing the characteristics
that are often reserved solely for male characters. All of these points can be
taken into consideration to see just how far the homosexual undertones lie
within this story. It is easy to see how Peter
Pan refers heavily to the homosexuality between women.
Works Cited
Barrie, J. M., and Nora S.
Unwin. Peter
Pan. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1950. Print.
Keating, Shannon. "Peter
Pan, Queer Icon." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 04
Dec. 2014. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/12/peter-pan-queer-icon/383422/>.
Postcolonial Theory: Then and now
Much like New Historicism, Postcolonial Theory is a concept that deals largely with social history. However, this theory also looks closely at physiology and the social aspects of people and literature. Postcolonial Theory focuses on the different races and ethnicity of people, as well as colonization and its effects on different cultures.
Postcolonial Theory requires just as much research as that of New Historicism. By looking at literature before colonization and comparing it to the literature after, theorists can get a better idea of the impact that was made when these cultures collided.
If Postcolonial theorists focused only on literature after colonization, or even solely on literature before colonization, the same similarities and differences would not be able to be drawn and the same conclusions would not be made.
When looking at these two forms of literature, it is common to see how he colonized people often resent the destruction of their cultures. Different aspects of culture such as religion, customs, and languages can all be lost in the process of colonization. In some circumstances, these practices can even be outlawed by those colonizing the different tribes and communities. After this, the only remains of the the original inhabitants are left in what writings or art they may have had.
Today, many people continue writing novels and other forms of literature about colonization and the effects it had on their homes and the lives they once knew. These writings are great examples for some of the literature that Postcolonial Theorists have to work with. As long as cultural and social aspects of life are constantly changing, there will always be a place for Postcolonial Theory. It's hope is that perhaps it can shed light on more positive ways change can be made in the future.
Citations:
Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonialism>.
Queer Reading of Harry Potter
Nichole Currier
Robin DeRosa
Critical Theory
8 December 2015
Harry
Potter and the Chamber of Secret Meanings
One
of the most well known book series in children’s literature is the seven book
series Harry Potter by J.K. Rowling.
Inspiring kids of many ages for years, Harry
Potter is a series that deals with many timeless issues. Telling the story
of a young boy who is out of place until he realizes his true identity as a
wizard, it’s easy to see how any outcast child could relate to this series.
However, what happens when a queer theory is spun on the novels to provide an
entirely new meaning for Harry’s story and the way his life plays out? Small
aspects such as Harry’s abuse from the Dursley’s and his room in the closet,
the way he and other wizards are viewed and treated by people such as the
Dursley’s, and the connection Harry immediately feels after meeting more people
like himself suddenly mean much more. David Nylund also takes a look at this
theory in his paper Reading Harry Potter:
Popular Culture, Queer Theory and the Fashioning of Youth Identity. By
taking all of these details into consideration, it’s easy to see how Harry Potter may have a deeper and more
complex meaning than readers initially though. Looking at the story through
this lens has the possibility of even changing the entire meaning of the story.
Harry Potter is actually a story
about a young boy fighting against the homosexual abuse of his childhood and
coming to terms with his sexuality.
Since
infancy, Harry was forced to live with his awful aunt, uncle, and cousin.
Constantly being abused by these three members of his family, it is easy to see
why Harry resents home so much. The Dursley’s excuse for their constant
hardships on Harry, however, is solely for the fact that he is different than
them in a way that they cannot understand. “In short, Harry is different and
fated to live in the world of so-called “normal” people” (Nylund). This relates
directly back to homosexual children who are caught in the position of trying
to come out to a family that does not understand this sexuality. The book
series goes so far as to put Harry in his own closet underneath the stairs, a
metaphor that is used constantly by the queer community as someone being ‘in
the closet’ before admitting to themselves or others that they are homosexual.
When Hagrid arrives to take Harry away from his abusive home can be seen as the
moment Harry finally made the decision to come out of the closet. Yet the
Dursley’s never let up on their constant ridicule of the wizarding community.
It’s
important to look closely at how the Dursley’s go about demeaning wizards and
those that are different from them. Nyund points out how Mr. Dursley is
constantly referring to this community as “her crowd” and “their kind” when
speaking about Harry and his late mother. These are terms that are constantly
used in the ridiculing of homosexuals. When Harry is forced to live under his
aunt and uncle’s roof, such as between school semesters, he is constantly told
to stay in his room and keep quiet. Mr. Dursley’s solution to the problem of
his nephew being different is to shut him up and be sure he is never seen or
heard from. This is a punishment that many homosexual children face in
households that do not accept who they are. This is also a method that had been
used in times when homosexuality was seen as a disease that needed to be cured.
In what was said to be meditation like practices, homosexuals were locked away
for days at a time in an attempt to cure them of their homosexuality. They were
lead to believe they were completely different and were treated as outcasts,
much like Harry. However, these people were not alone.
One
important aspect of the Harry Potter series
to take into consideration is the amount of acceptance that Harry feels when he
is finally surrounded by those that are just like him. He no longer feels
ridiculed or out of place, but supported and liked by those who share the same
traits he does. Nyund compares these feelings to those told in his paper by a
young homosexual, Steven. Steven shares how, when he was introduced to other
homosexuals who had gone through similar circumstances he had, he “felt a lot
less alone. [He] imagined that’s how Harry felt when he went to Hogwarts and
found out there were other kids who were different” (Nyund). Just like Steven,
Harry felt absolutely alone when stuck in his house with the Dursley’s.
However, it was when he was saved by Hagrid and taken off to Hogwarts that he
realized he wasn’t alone. This realization is what helped Harry, and Steven,
come to terms with who they really were and continue to live life through the
hardships that others faced them with.
Many
aspects of the Harry Potter series by
J.K. Rowling show how there may be more to the story than what is initially
seen. Harry can be seen as a young boy who, stuck in a household where he is
unappreciated and unvalued, is constantly forced to deal with the fact that he
is different from those around him. He is ridiculed, harassed, and ultimately
abused daily for these differences. However, when he finally finds a group of
people who share these differences with him, it’s the final bit of strength
Harry needs to fight through the hardships that have been presented to him
since childhood. While many see Harry
Potter simply as a story about ‘the boy who lived,’ it is much more than
that. Harry Potter is actually a
story about a young boy fighting against the homosexual abuse of his childhood
and coming to terms with his sexuality.
Works Cited
Journal Of Systemic Therapies,
Vol. 26, No. 2, 2007, Pp. 13–. Journal
of Systemic Therapies, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2007, Pp. 13–24 READING HARRY POTTER:
POPULAR CULTURE, QUEER THEORY AND THE FASHIONING OF YOUTH IDENTITY (n.d.): n. pag. Web.
Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter. London: Bloomsbury,
2007. Print.
New Historicism: Grab your history books
Alright history buffs, here is the theory for you. New Historicism takes a moment to step back and take a look at literature in regards to history, both ancient and recent. This theory, much against the approval of New Critics, believe that literature links itself to political, social, and cultural aspects of every day life.
While this theory could be applied to just about any piece of text, it focuses largely on the twentieth century. As one would assume, research plays a large role in this theory and works as the basis for what is produced. So turn on the History channel, guys, you're not getting all that research done just by sitting around and procrastinating.
Another aspect of New Historicism is that of Cultural Studies. These studies focus more largely on the cultural aspect of texts as opposed to solely the historical. This opens the doors to many different non-literary aspects of life that can be used in research such as music, fashion, letters, and movies.
Another important part of New Historicism to remember is that history is not linear. What does linear mean? Simple:
History does not follow in one, single, completely predictable line. One cannot focus solely on a few significant people of a time and assume that everything they did, and only what they did, can sum up the history for that time period. People who lived everyday, mundane lives mattered as well. If you still aren't grasping what I mean, try taking a look at the play Our Town by Oscar Wilde.
History can be found in and utilized through many different pieces of literature. By thinking outside of the box and looking through more than just the stereotypical names and events of a certain time period, one can see just how the mundane lifestyle may have structured a great piece of writing.
Citations:
While this theory could be applied to just about any piece of text, it focuses largely on the twentieth century. As one would assume, research plays a large role in this theory and works as the basis for what is produced. So turn on the History channel, guys, you're not getting all that research done just by sitting around and procrastinating.
Another aspect of New Historicism is that of Cultural Studies. These studies focus more largely on the cultural aspect of texts as opposed to solely the historical. This opens the doors to many different non-literary aspects of life that can be used in research such as music, fashion, letters, and movies.
Another important part of New Historicism to remember is that history is not linear. What does linear mean? Simple:
History does not follow in one, single, completely predictable line. One cannot focus solely on a few significant people of a time and assume that everything they did, and only what they did, can sum up the history for that time period. People who lived everyday, mundane lives mattered as well. If you still aren't grasping what I mean, try taking a look at the play Our Town by Oscar Wilde.
History can be found in and utilized through many different pieces of literature. By thinking outside of the box and looking through more than just the stereotypical names and events of a certain time period, one can see just how the mundane lifestyle may have structured a great piece of writing.
Citations:
"File:Linear Sorption Isotherm.svg." - Wikimedia Commons. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Linear_sorption_isotherm.svg>.
"History - Google Search." History - Google Search. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <https://www.google.com/search?q=history&safe=off&rlz=1C1TSNO_enUS603US603&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiOt7CmiszJAhUC2R4KHZZXCYYQ_AUIBygB&biw=1366&bih=599#safe=off&tbs=sur:fc&tbm=isch&q=oscar+wilde&imgrc=3736QvsKuShm3M%3A>.
Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_(Australian_TV_channel)>.
Queer Reading of Frankenstein
Nichole Currier
Robin DeRosa
Critical Theory
8 December 2015
The
Secret Desires of Frankenstein
Mary
Shelley’s Frankenstein is one of the
most well known works of gothic literature. The story revolves around Victor
and his attempts, as well as successes, in creating a living creature. Through
this journey, however, the reader is introduced to many other themes that are
not so apparent on the surface level. One of these themes is that of
homosexuality. Having been published in 1818, Frankenstein was written in a
time when this was still an extremely controversial subject. Today, the idea is
discussed openly. Douglas Sadownick addresses this theory in The Man Who Loved Frankenstein, where he
discusses Frankenstein’s envy of female procreation as well as the close
relationship he develops with Walton. Michael Eberle-Sinatra also explores this
topic in Readings of Homosexuality in
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Four Film Adaptations, where he discusses
Victor’s relationship with Elizabeth as well as her constant concern that
Victor’s love resides in another. One can also consider Victor’s extremely
close relationship with Henry throughout the story as a symbol for the
disregarded homosexual feelings Victor possesses. His relationship with male
character differs greatly from those he shares with the female characters
throughout the novel. Victor continuously hides his homosexual feelings from
those around him throughout Frankenstein
by Mary Shelley.
The
first example of Victor inhabiting homosexual desires can be seen in his
process and obsession of creating a living being. “[Many] argued that
Frankenstein was a feminist take on the male envy of female procreation…I was
fascinated by the idea of procreating a "person" of the same sex as
oneself” (Sadownick). By choosing to create a male creature instead of a
female, the reader can see how Victor’s desires lean more towards
homosexuality. Eberle-Sinatra points out how “the language used to describe the
making of the Creature by Victor in the novel suggests masturbation.” Looking
at the language that Victor uses when retelling his creation to Walton, it is
easy to see how his story may have underlying homosexual desires. Victor tells
how he “disturbed, with profane fingers, the tremendous secrets of the human
frame. In a solitary chamber…I kept my workshop of filthy creation” (Shelley
58). Not only is Victor attempting to take on the role of female procreation,
he finds an erotic joy from it as well. “These masturbatory elements also
suggest homosexual fantasies” (Eberle-Sinatra). Victor shows more interest and
excitement in his creation than he does with any other subject in the book,
including that of his love, Elizabeth.
Having
met her at a very young age and developing an immediate attachment, it was
decided early on that Elizabeth would eventually become Victor’s wife. However,
as the two grow older Victor avoids his promise of marrying Elizabeth and
instead goes off to complete his studies and experiments with his creature.
Eberle-Sinatra points out how “the novel's Victor is obsessed with the
Creature, who repeatedly makes his pulse beat faster and his brow sweat,” a
reaction that Victor never has towards Elizabeth. Even after leaving his
creation, Victor is constantly remembering “the nervous fever with which [he]
had been seized just at the time that [he] dated [his] creation” (Shelley 76).
Yet Victor hardly pays any mind to Elizabeth, who is constantly sending him
letters and reaching out to him. Victor’s father notices his distance,
confronting Victor about it on page 133 where he states “I confess, my son,
that I have always looked forward to your marriage with our dear Elizabeth…but
so blind is the experience of man…you may have met with another whom you may
love.” Victor’s father makes no comment on whether the other he loves is male
or female, leaving the passage open to reader interpretation. Even when Victor
responds, “My dear father, re-assure yourself. I love my cousin tenderly and
sincerely. I never saw any woman who excited, as Elizabeth does, my warmest
admiration and affection” (Shelley 133), he is specific in saying that he has
never seen another woman who he
adores. Victor does not, nor could he in this time period, address the
possibility that another man has stolen his love from Elizabeth. “The possibility
that Victor might have met another man clearly does not occur to his father,
and to a certain extent neither does this possibility occur to Victor himself,
though he is certainly much more excited physically by the thought of the
Creature and its physical presence than he is by Elizabeth” (Eberle-Sinatra).
However, the creature is not the only male character that seems to cause
excitement in Victor.
After
his creature escapes, Victor sets out to capture the beast and finds himself in
the presence of Walton. Almost immediately, Walton is blatantly taken with
Victor, writing to his sister how “my affection for my guest increases every
day. He excites at once my admiration and my pity to an astonishing agree”
(Shelley 37). Victor even goes so far as to return these feelings when Walton
says “I spoke of my desire of finding a friend—of my thirst for a more intimate
sympathy with a fellow mind could boast of little happiness, who did not enjoy
this blessing” (Shelley 38). Victor replies with “I agree with you…we are
unfashioned creatures, but half made up, if one wiser, better, dearer that
ourselves—such a friend ought to be—do not lend his aid to perfectionate our
weak and faulty natures,” and continues on to say “I once had a friend, the
most noble of human creatures, and am entitled, therefore, to judge respecting
friendship” (Shelley 38). In this section, Victor not only returns Walton’s
affectionate feelings, but goes on to speak of Henry and the feelings he once
had for this friend.
There are many instances
throughout Victor’s story where he speaks highly of Henry, in a way that can
easily be seen as affection and admiration. Henry also cared for Victor, taking
time out of his studies after Victor’s incident with the creature to nurse his
friend back to health. Victor admits to himself upon seeing Henry after that
dreadful night that “nothing could equal my delight on seeing Clerval” (Shelley
62). The presence of his friend immediately calms Victor, even after the
horrors he just witnessed over his creation. However, this love can most
plainly be seen after Henry’s death. Even before telling the story to Walton,
Victor shares how “little did I then expect the calamity that was in a few
moments to overwhelm me…I must pause here; for it requires all my fortitude to
recall the memory of the frightful events which I am about to relate” (Shelley
151). Victor goes on to tell how he was taken into custody for the suspected
murder of his friend. It was not until Victor entered the room where the body
of Henry lay, though, that he realized who had been killed. Victor’s reaction
to seeing the lifeless body of Henry is one that shows how deeply he cared for
his friend. “I gasped for breath; and, throwing myself on the body, I
exclaimed, ‘Have my murderous machinations deprived you also, my dearest Henry,
of life? Two I have already destroyed; other victims await their destiny: but
you, Clerval, my friend, my benefactor—” (Shelley 153). Victor cuts himself off
at this point in his rant, falling into a convulsion of uncontrollable sobs
over the loss of his friend. This leaves the reader to wonder what Victor would
have continued to say about his deceased friend, had he the strength to do so.
It can easily be assumed that Victor would have gone on to call his beloved Henry
“my love.”
Throughout
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the
reader follows Victor as he creates a living being. More importantly, though,
the reader has a chance to see as Victor sees and feel as Victor feels about
the events happening around him. After analyzing his thoughts of these tragic
months, it can be seen that Victor had many feelings that were not brought to
the surface through his story. From the homosexual reasons behind creating a
male monster to his indirect rejection of Elizabeth to the strong bond he
created with both Walton and Henry, it is clear that Victor’s relationships
with males differed greatly for that with females. Victor continuously hid his
homosexual feelings from those around him throughout the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley.
Works
Cited
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Johanna M. Smith. Frankenstein:
Complete, Authoritative Text with Biographical, Historical, and Cultural
Contexts, Critical History, and Essays from Contemporary Critical Perspectives.
Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2000. Print.
Eberle-Sinatra, Michael. "Readings of Homosexuality in Mary
Shelley's Frankenstein and Four Film
Adaptations." Gothic Studies 7.2
(2005): 187-202. Web.
Sadownick, Douglas. "The Man Who Loved Frankenstein." (n.d.):
n. pag. Web.
Monday, December 7, 2015
Psychoanalysis: The family romance
Psychoanalysis is a theory that deals heavily with the human psyche, starting from the early stages of infancy and following throughout childhood.
One of the first stages in psychoanalysis theory that needs to be understood is that of the Id, Ego, and Superego. Each of these represents a part of the unconscious mind and the way it operates.
Id: The Id is the most selfish of all three sections. The Id is the section of the brain that is concerned with oneself and only oneself. This section of the mind contains things such as sexual desires, need for satisfaction, and the fulfillment of biological desires.
Ego: This section of the brain is the closest to the conscious mind. This section deals with reality and works to keep the Id in check. Without the Ego, the Id would be off demanding anything and everything it wanted. The Ego, however, keeps the Id behaving in a socially acceptable manner.
Superego: The Superego works off of guilt. This is the section of the brain that works as a conscience and holds on to morals and values.
These are the basic terms on which the mind works off of. Once these are understood, one can dive deeper into the world on psychoanalytic.
One aspect of growing up that every child must go through to reach a healthy point of adult hood is that of developing feelings for his or her parents. Boys and girls are also presented with an envy and fear of wanting to be the other gender.
For girls, this comes across as penis envy.
For boys, castration complex.
When a young girl realizes that nature has not given her the same body as a boy, she beings to envy for a penis so she can be more like the central male figure in her life; her father. As she grows older, this want turns into that for a baby, which ultimately turns into a want for another man.
As for boys, when they realize that girls do not have the same parts that they do they begin to worry that this means the penis is detachable. This develops into a fear of castration, which ultimately develops into a fear of losing wholeness and control in one's life as the boy grows older.
These aspects focus largely on gender, just as the feminism theory does. However, this theory focuses on gender in a much different way, applying it more to the psyche and how this effects those growing up and through these stages.
Citations:
"File:Structural-Iceberg.svg." - Wikimedia Commons. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Structural-Iceberg.svg>.
One of the first stages in psychoanalysis theory that needs to be understood is that of the Id, Ego, and Superego. Each of these represents a part of the unconscious mind and the way it operates.
Id: The Id is the most selfish of all three sections. The Id is the section of the brain that is concerned with oneself and only oneself. This section of the mind contains things such as sexual desires, need for satisfaction, and the fulfillment of biological desires.
Ego: This section of the brain is the closest to the conscious mind. This section deals with reality and works to keep the Id in check. Without the Ego, the Id would be off demanding anything and everything it wanted. The Ego, however, keeps the Id behaving in a socially acceptable manner.
Superego: The Superego works off of guilt. This is the section of the brain that works as a conscience and holds on to morals and values.
These are the basic terms on which the mind works off of. Once these are understood, one can dive deeper into the world on psychoanalytic.
One aspect of growing up that every child must go through to reach a healthy point of adult hood is that of developing feelings for his or her parents. Boys and girls are also presented with an envy and fear of wanting to be the other gender.
For girls, this comes across as penis envy.
For boys, castration complex.
When a young girl realizes that nature has not given her the same body as a boy, she beings to envy for a penis so she can be more like the central male figure in her life; her father. As she grows older, this want turns into that for a baby, which ultimately turns into a want for another man.
As for boys, when they realize that girls do not have the same parts that they do they begin to worry that this means the penis is detachable. This develops into a fear of castration, which ultimately develops into a fear of losing wholeness and control in one's life as the boy grows older.
These aspects focus largely on gender, just as the feminism theory does. However, this theory focuses on gender in a much different way, applying it more to the psyche and how this effects those growing up and through these stages.
Citations:
"File:Structural-Iceberg.svg." - Wikimedia Commons. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Structural-Iceberg.svg>.
Queer Reading of Disney's Frozen
Nichole Currier
Robin DeRosa
Critical Theory
8 December 2015
Queer
Reading of Disney’s Frozen
Disney
films are often known for their perfect, fairy tale story line. A beautiful
princess finds herself in an awful situation, but is ultimately rescued by her
dashing prince charming and they marry before living happily ever after. But
what happens when one looks at these stories through a Queer Theory lens? Do
these stories still hold the same stereotypical, heterosexual plot line we all
know and cherish? Many would argue that they do not. In fact, just about any
Disney movie contains a female character that goes against the social norms and
what is expected from her by her family because she is misunderstood. In The Little Mermaid, Ariel refuses to
listen to her father, as she wishes to be free to go to the human world and
live the life she dreams of. In Aladdin, Jasmine
denies the suitors her father lines us for her, insisting that she does not
wish to be pushed into a relationship she does not feel is right for her. Even
in Mulan, Mulan continuously
questions the social norms of her town and the match making she is forced to
endure, having rather change her entire identity to make a difference in her
world and live the life she wanted. However, none of these movies imply
homosexual tendencies quite as strongly as one of Disney’s most recent films; Frozen.
In her queer reading of the Disney
movie, Conceal, Don’t Feel: A Queer
Reading of Disney’s [Frozen], Angel Daniel Matos discusses how “Frozen is perhaps the queerest film ever
produced by Disney” (Matos). Matos goes on to discuss the various points
throughout the film that lead to her conclusion that it contains various queer
undertones. Many of these points have to do with one of the main protagonists
of the film; Elsa. Frozen is a
heterosexual film that shows the struggle of Elsa as she overcomes her
differences and accepts who she truly is.
In her paper, Matos shows how at the
very beginning of the film Elsa’s parents realize there is something ‘wrong’
with her. After deciding that she would be incapable of living life like
everyone else in the kingdom, her parents shut Elsa away in her room and limit
any contact she may have with anyone else in the kingdom. This isolated room
translates quite literally to the metaphor of homosexuals living in a closet
before revealing their true feelings to those around them. By keeping Elsa
locked away in her own form of a closet, Disney shows how she lives the early
stages of her life hiding who she really is to everyone. “It is uncanny that
the main enforcers of Elsa’s suppression are her parents—authority figures that
try their best to uphold an image of normalcy by shutting Elsa away from the
outside world” (Matos). By keeping Elsa in her safe haven, her parents succeed in
keeping her ‘powers’ hidden for her entire childhood life. It is after her
parents die and Elsa is released from this closet, however, that the homosexual
undertones of the film can truly be seen.
Almost immediately after receiving
the crown to her kingdom following her parents death, Elsa begins breaking the
binaries that surround her. Though by accident, she ends up revealing her
secret and her true self to the entire kingdom during her coronation. While
Elsa does flee in fear of being harmed for what people now know of her (a
common occurrence in many homosexual stories) she begins to accept the facts
about herself once she is alone. For Elsa, “breaking away from family and
forgetting family lineage becomes a way of starting fresh even though it entails
a failure from engaging in the heteronormative enterprise of the nuclear
family” (Matos). The most popular scene of the film, where Elsa retreats up the
snowy mountains singing Let it Go,
can easily be seen as the moment she comes out of the closet and embraces who
she truly is. Even when confronted by her sister, Elsa insists that she cannot
go back because she is incapable of changing herself. Even when she does return
to the kingdom, Matos points out how Elsa “declares that the gates of the
castle shall stay open to the entire community, thus obliterating the divide
that was being upheld between the domesticity of the castle and the queerness
of the outside world.”
One aspect of the film that Matos
does not focus largely on in her paper is the fact that Elsa is not
romantically involved with any of the male characters at any point throughout
the film. In fact, it is her sister that is taken by both the male characters
of the film at various points of the plot. Elsa, on the other hand, is
constantly left on her own as she pushes away and ultimately accepts her
‘powers.’ This goes against not only the stereotypical standards of a happily
ever after fairy tale, but also against the standards that Disney has put into
place for the movies that have preceded this one. By having Elsa continuously
be on her own, it shows the struggle she faces in accepting who she is when no
one else will. This plays largely into the main theme that is often associated
with homosexuality, that of being misunderstood and having to come to terms
with one’s differences.
There are many aspects of this movie
that play into the heterosexual reading. Elsa is isolated from her kingdom
after her parents realize she is different. She is denied contact with anyone
and spends her days locked away in what refers strongly to the metaphorical
‘closet’ that many kids find themselves in today. When she does accept who she
is, though, Elsa begins to find happiness with herself and those around her.
She vows to keep the palace doors open, putting an end to the social binaries
she was forced to uphold during her childhood. More than this, Elsa is never
seen with a romantic interest at any point throughout this film. Binaries and
stereotypes are constantly being broken in a way that makes Frozen an easy candidate for a queer
theory reading. Frozen is a
heterosexual film that shows the struggle of Elsa as she overcomes her
differences and accepts who she truly is.
Citations:
Matos, Angel Daniel. "Conceal, Don't Feel: A Queer Reading of Disney's [Frozen]." The Ever and Ever That Fiction Allows. N.p., 19 Jan. 2014. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <http://angelmatos.net/2014/01/19/disneys-frozen-queer/>.
Frozen. Dir. Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck. Walt Disney Pictures, 2013. DVD.
Frozen. Dir. Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck. Walt Disney Pictures, 2013. DVD.
Queer Theory: We're here, we're queer
Becoming popular with the gay rights movement, queer theory has been around for quite some time. Just as the title suggests, this theory focuses on the topics of homosexuality versus heterosexuality in literature. This theory looks at the natural desires and wants of people and characters.
Very similar to this theory, but slightly different, are gay and lesbian studies. While gay and lesbian studies focus largely on the homosexual conclusions of certain texts, queer theory looks deeper to find the exact patterns and implications that may lead to a character coming across as homosexual.
This brings into question, however, what the term homosexual really means. There are three stages of same sex interaction that can be taken into consideration when deciding if a text is truly leading towards homosexuality or not.
Homosocial: This term refers to situations that place same sex people together. Really, this can be any situation. Perhaps two females are chatting in line at a grocery store or two males are discussing a job position over coffee. No matter what the circumstances, if two people of the same sex are having an interaction, it is homosocial.
Homoerotic: This terms refers to situations where people of the same sex are placed into situations that are erotically charged. This does not have to imply that homosexual preferences are being shown by either party, just that the situation may be more intimate than a homosocial one. An example of this would be a group of boys in a locker room, joking and shoving around after a game while changing out of their uniforms. Another example may be two girls at a sleep over together, whispering back and forth from the same bed before going to sleep. Each of these situations, while not explicitly homosexual, can be seen as homoerotic.
Homosexual: This term refers to a situation where two people of the same sex are romantically involved or possess a sexual desire for one another. Much more straight forward than the last two, homosexual situations are explicit while the other two may need to be inferred.
Queer Theory deals with other topics in literature such as the role of gender in homosexuality. Being a socially constructed concept, gender is often taken into consideration when looking at literature through queer theory.
Other things that are taken into consideration with queer theory are how characters go against social norms in literature. Queer theory also focuses on binaries that are broken throughout a piece of writing and how this can relate back to the binaries that are often being broken by acts of homosexuality.
Using this theory to examine different works of literature can reveal aspects that readers may not have thought to dissect before. Queer theory is a great example of how simply changing a theoretical lens can shift the view on an entire piece of work.
Citations:
"Free Image on Pixabay - Gay, Flag, Hand, Homosexual, Pride." Free Illustration: Gay, Flag, Hand, Homosexual, Pride. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <https://pixabay.com/en/gay-flag-hand-homosexual-pride-637453/>.
Deconstruction of a Poem
Nichole Currier
Robin DeRosa
Critical Theory
27 October 2015
Deconstruction
of a Poem
Finding
the true meaning of a poem has been the goal of many literary scholars for many
years. Analyzing lines and metaphors behind the lines of famous poems has often
given these researchers the means they needed to conclude with a single, sound
meaning for their text. However, this brings into question what happens when
there is no such thing as a single, sound meaning. According to Jim Powell in
his essay about Derrida, Structure, Sign,
and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences, “everything is
provisional; you can’t make positive/definitive statements.” Powell then goes
on to discuss how, to derive any meaning from literature, one must make
definitive statements regardless, while still remembering that “nothing is
stable, that meaning is always contingent and ambiguous.” Even if
one meaning is found for a piece of literature, one must keep in mind that this
is not the only meaning that can be taken from the work. Meaning will always be
unclear, making it impossible to conclude a single meaning for any text.
When
looking at a poem such as Stopping By
Woods on a Snowy Evening by Robert Frost, one can obtain a meaning of how
the woods represent the lure of death, while civilization represents the need
to continue living. Frost writes in one line how the owner of the woods “will
not see [him] stopping here, to watch his woods fill up with snow.” When
seasons are brought into play, winter is often used as a representation for
death as it is the time of year when plants begin to fade and animals disappear
for hibernation. By placing the setting of this poem to be in the winter, Frost
is already giving the allusion of something ominous amidst the peaceful scene
of the woods. Frost continues on in his second stanza to show his reader how
this happens to be “the darkest evening of the year.” Again, this gives the
reader a sense of foreboding and menace that may be lying in the undertones of
this poem. In the third stanza, the narrator of the poem notes how his horse
gives signs of wanting to leave, despite the beautiful scene of snow falling
and collecting in the depths of the woods. Frost tells in the last stanza of
his poem how, though “the woods are lovely, dark and deep,” the narrator has
“promises to keep, and miles to go before I sleep.” Though the woods are
described as lovely, one must consider how the narrator’s staying to admire
them for too long could result in his ultimate demise. With snow falling, the
traveler is in the potential situation of being buried by the sight he finds so
intriguing. Even the narrator himself seems to consider this fact as he reminds
himself that he cannot stay to admire the woods any longer, that he has “miles
to go before I sleep.” The narrator’s time for death, his time to enter the
woods, has not come yet and, because of this, he must keep moving.
This
is just one interpretation of Stopping By
Woods on a Snowy Evening by Robert Frost. However, one must then consider
what happens when the poem is interpreted a different way. Many aspects of the
poem can be seen as a representation for just the opposite of the first
analysis. Instead of representing death, it can be argued that this poem
represents life and the importance of life. In his first stanza, when
discussing the owner of the woods, Frost mentions how the owner’s “house is in
the village though.” Village can be seen as a representation for life in
itself, as it is the embodiment of people living and coinciding together
peacefully. Villages are often filled with noise, laughter, companionship,
young and old, male and female, and all the other aspects of human life. In the
second stanza, Frost notes how the “little horse must think it queer to stop
without a farmhouse near.” Even the animal in the poem shows an acknowledgment
of moving on until civilization is met, of not stopping in a desolate place
when life is so close. The insistent of this horse continues into the third
stanza, when Frost shows how the horse “gives his harness bells a shake to ask
if there is some mistake.” Though his owner is taken with the scene of the
woods, the horse continues to push him towards their destination and the other
people who await there. In the last stanza, the narrator himself comes to this
same realization as he remember that he has “promises to keep.” While it is not
specified what exactly these promises are, they give reason for the narrator to
keep moving towards the village as opposed to staying in the woods any longer.
One can assume that the narrator’s promise has been given, perhaps, to someone
else residing in the village, another person that the poem does not mention.
Regardless of who he is referring to, this promise is what gives the narrator
reason to continue striving for life and continuing to travel towards it.
By
looking at these two meanings, one can see how easy it is to derive a complete
opposite interpretation from a single poem. Going beyond this, it shows how any
meaning can be taken from the single poem, the possibilities are endless. As
Powell states in his essay, “totalization is impossible: there might be too
much to say, too many things to account for.” Coming up with a single, sound
meaning for a piece of text is impossible because the meaning is continuously
shifting and changing for each person who analyzes it. When taking absolutely
everything that a poem contains into consideration, Powell explains how all
“elements can’t be fixed and measured and accounted for.” There is too much to
consider and evaluate, making one single meaning impossible to obtain.
Post Structuralism: What is meaning?
Unlike structuralism, post structuralism does not require structure. In fact, post structuralism requires very little, as their only concern is understanding that absolutely nothing has any one set meaning.
Quite the opposite of the structuralism theory.
When using post structuralism to deconstruct a piece of literature, it is important to keep in mind that there is no single conclusion. Yet sound conclusions must be found to argue the meaning of literature. Even when this conclusion is decided upon and argued, however, there will always be someone able to argue the opposite. This shows how, with the post structuralism theory, meaning will always be unclear.
This picture represents post structuralism in simple terms. While using the structuralism theory, one can see the picture of the pipe as a signifier for an actual pipe itself (the signified). Yet the words underneath, which translate to 'This is not a pipe' show how this picture would be looked at through a post structuralist view. While one person may argue that it is, in fact, a pipe, it is also possible for someone else to argue that it is not.
Post structuralism also goes against theories such as New Criticism, who insist that the single meaning of a text can be found directly within the literature. Yet this is exactly what post structuralism argues; there is no one meaning.
There is no capitol 'T' truth in regards to anything.
Citations:
"Ceci N'est Pas Une Valentine." Flickr. N.p., 31 Jan. 2007. Web. <https://www.flickr.com/photos/dan_dan/375693313>.
Quite the opposite of the structuralism theory.
When using post structuralism to deconstruct a piece of literature, it is important to keep in mind that there is no single conclusion. Yet sound conclusions must be found to argue the meaning of literature. Even when this conclusion is decided upon and argued, however, there will always be someone able to argue the opposite. This shows how, with the post structuralism theory, meaning will always be unclear.
This picture represents post structuralism in simple terms. While using the structuralism theory, one can see the picture of the pipe as a signifier for an actual pipe itself (the signified). Yet the words underneath, which translate to 'This is not a pipe' show how this picture would be looked at through a post structuralist view. While one person may argue that it is, in fact, a pipe, it is also possible for someone else to argue that it is not.
Post structuralism also goes against theories such as New Criticism, who insist that the single meaning of a text can be found directly within the literature. Yet this is exactly what post structuralism argues; there is no one meaning.
There is no capitol 'T' truth in regards to anything.
Citations:
"Ceci N'est Pas Une Valentine." Flickr. N.p., 31 Jan. 2007. Web. <https://www.flickr.com/photos/dan_dan/375693313>.
Structuralism: Sign, signified, and signifier
As the name would imply, structuralism depends largely on one thing: structure. This structure can be seen in three simple steps that decode language. These steps would be the signifier, the signified, and the sign.
But what do those words mean?
Signifier is simple. Whenever a word is said, that is the signifier. Say, for instance, someone is discussing a tree. The words tree means nothing, but it's a signifier for what is actually being discussed.
This brings us to the next step, the signified. This would be the actual object that the signifier is referring to. So, say someone is discussing a tree. While the word tree is the signifier, the signified would be this:
However, even this:
cannot be considered a signified, because this picture is simply acting as yet another signifier. The only way to truly grasp the signified would be by going to the window and seeing this:
for yourself. That actual, tangible object (which comes to mind when someone uses the signifier 'tree') is the signified.
So then what's sign? Sign is simply the connection between both the signifier and the signified.
On the outside, the similar words can seem confusing. However, they mean no more than exactly what they sound like, and are no harder to grasp than the concept of:
Citations:
"Tree." Wikipedia. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree>.
But what do those words mean?
Signifier is simple. Whenever a word is said, that is the signifier. Say, for instance, someone is discussing a tree. The words tree means nothing, but it's a signifier for what is actually being discussed.
This brings us to the next step, the signified. This would be the actual object that the signifier is referring to. So, say someone is discussing a tree. While the word tree is the signifier, the signified would be this:
However, even this:
cannot be considered a signified, because this picture is simply acting as yet another signifier. The only way to truly grasp the signified would be by going to the window and seeing this:
for yourself. That actual, tangible object (which comes to mind when someone uses the signifier 'tree') is the signified.
So then what's sign? Sign is simply the connection between both the signifier and the signified.
On the outside, the similar words can seem confusing. However, they mean no more than exactly what they sound like, and are no harder to grasp than the concept of:
Citations:
"Tree." Wikipedia. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree>.
Feminism: More than just women in literature
Feminism: the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men.
Women have been fighting for equal rights to men for years and this has often become the sole thought that comes to people's minds when they hear the word 'feminism.' However, this theory has much more meaning when applied to literature.
While equality issues are dealt with in the form of feminism writing, this theory also applies to other gender and race based topics. Questions are often focused on such as 'Are women equal to men?' or 'How does the oppression of women of color differ from that of white women?' or 'How does oppression effect women and their role within society?'
Different sections of feminism theory include Rights Based Feminism, Essentialist Feminism, Materialist Feminism, French Feminism, and Foucauldian Feminism.
Rights Based Feminism is what much of the media focuses on. This movement aims for women to have equal rights to men in terms of economical and professional standings. Women should have equal rights to vote, equal job opportunities, and equal salary incomes that men do.
Essentialist Feminism focuses more solely on the social aspect of women compared to men. This theory focuses on exactly how women are viewed differently from men in terms of values and emotions.
Materialist Feminism shows the oppression that women have gone through over the years. Materialists focus on how men have used power to overshadow women in many different aspects of life, as well as the importance of women overcoming this oppression.
French Feminism takes a more post structuralism approach to the situation. This theory shows how the opinion of women should not be created by men, but by other women to avoid the binary that has already been put into place. By standing together, women can overcome the oppression they have received.
Lastly, there's Foucauldian Feminism. This theory takes a look at how bodies and people display gender rather than one's anatomy. This view opens the doors to topics such as cross dressing and transgenders. This theory also takes a look at the cultural reactions and opinions in regards to these topics.
While dealing with many different aspects and sections of this single theory, each part of feminism shares one thing in common. This theory takes a look at women as a whole and how they are viewed by men, society, and themselves. With the ever changing laws and standards regarding women in every day life, this leads to feminism being a theory that always stays relevant.
Citations:
Women have been fighting for equal rights to men for years and this has often become the sole thought that comes to people's minds when they hear the word 'feminism.' However, this theory has much more meaning when applied to literature.
While equality issues are dealt with in the form of feminism writing, this theory also applies to other gender and race based topics. Questions are often focused on such as 'Are women equal to men?' or 'How does the oppression of women of color differ from that of white women?' or 'How does oppression effect women and their role within society?'
Different sections of feminism theory include Rights Based Feminism, Essentialist Feminism, Materialist Feminism, French Feminism, and Foucauldian Feminism.
Rights Based Feminism is what much of the media focuses on. This movement aims for women to have equal rights to men in terms of economical and professional standings. Women should have equal rights to vote, equal job opportunities, and equal salary incomes that men do.
Essentialist Feminism focuses more solely on the social aspect of women compared to men. This theory focuses on exactly how women are viewed differently from men in terms of values and emotions.
Materialist Feminism shows the oppression that women have gone through over the years. Materialists focus on how men have used power to overshadow women in many different aspects of life, as well as the importance of women overcoming this oppression.
French Feminism takes a more post structuralism approach to the situation. This theory shows how the opinion of women should not be created by men, but by other women to avoid the binary that has already been put into place. By standing together, women can overcome the oppression they have received.
Lastly, there's Foucauldian Feminism. This theory takes a look at how bodies and people display gender rather than one's anatomy. This view opens the doors to topics such as cross dressing and transgenders. This theory also takes a look at the cultural reactions and opinions in regards to these topics.
While dealing with many different aspects and sections of this single theory, each part of feminism shares one thing in common. This theory takes a look at women as a whole and how they are viewed by men, society, and themselves. With the ever changing laws and standards regarding women in every day life, this leads to feminism being a theory that always stays relevant.
Citations:
"Free Image on Pixabay - Oppression, Women, Violence, Barbie." Free Photo: Oppression, Women, Violence, Barbie. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <https://pixabay.com/en/oppression-women-violence-barbie-458621/>.
"OpenClipartVectors." Pixabay. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://pixabay.com/en/emancipation-eurythmics-feminism-156066/>.
Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2015. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcha-feminism>.
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
Reader Response: You, as the reader, have all the power
Quite to the contrary of what New Criticism says, Reader Response is a theory that goes completely against the idea that the meaning of a text lies solely in the text. While the text is still a significant part of determining the meaning, it is ultimately up to the reader to decide what that meaning is.
However, this leads to a variety of meanings being possible for one single text. While one person may think a certain text means one thing, somebody else could think it means something completely different. This may lead you back to that wonderful lesson that we all received in middle school about how we're all different in our own special ways.
However, this leads to a variety of meanings being possible for one single text. While one person may think a certain text means one thing, somebody else could think it means something completely different. This may lead you back to that wonderful lesson that we all received in middle school about how we're all different in our own special ways.
Though this doesn't give justification to any response one could come up with off the top of their head for the meaning of a text.
"Jimmy, what do you think the meaning of this text is?"
"Cats."
"Jimmy, there are no cats in this text."
"As a reader response critic, it is my right to say that the meaning is whatever I see fit."
Not quite. Even with such an endless amount of possibilities, an analysis still needs proper evidence to back it up. A thesis, details from the reading, and a conclusion are still necessary for an analysis based off of the reader's interpretation. Even if the reader's analysis is not what the writer intended, this can be used by reader response critics to examine the text and how it functions.
This also puts into question who the ideal reader would be for analyzing a text. What parts of the text should be focused on? What outside sources should be taken into consideration? What traits make the ideal reader? If these questions are kept in mind while reading through texts and finding their meanings, you too can improve yourself as an analyzer of literature. Then you are one step closer to becoming a Reader Response Critic.
Citations:
"Individuality." Flickr. Yahoo!, n.d. Web. 17 Nov. 2015. <https://www.flickr.com/photos/rikkis_refuge/5339137231>.
Citations:
"Individuality." Flickr. Yahoo!, n.d. Web. 17 Nov. 2015. <https://www.flickr.com/photos/rikkis_refuge/5339137231>.
Monday, September 21, 2015
New Criticism: You, as the reader, do not exist
So you wanna learn theory. Well, then you've come to the right place. Literary theories can be tricky, especially when taking into consideration the different viewpoints each theory comes from. The real question they're all trying to answer, though, is where does the meaning of the text lie? When it comes to New Criticism, the answer is simple: the meaning lies in the text itself! Easy, right? But what does it actually mean for the meaning to lie solely in the text? Where does the author or we, as readers, come into play?
Let me break it down for you. When reading a piece of literature from a New Criticism stand point, reader and author go out the window. Author's biography? Irrelevant. Your emotional response to the work? Useless. The intent that the writer had when he created wrote the piece? Who cares! What really matters is the actual writing and what can be gotten from that. Tools such as denotations, connotations, etymology, and symbolism are a New Critic's best friend.
This may leave you wondering, though, where a New Critic gets the right to say your opinion doesn't matter. Well, here's how it is; according to New Criticism, authors don't always plan or even understand their work. Therefore, whatever the author intended the meaning to be doesn't necessarily mean that's what they ended up with. A piece of writing could be seen one way by one person, yet mean something completely different to someone else. When emotions come into play, it's impossible to settle on one single meaning of a text. Taking this into consideration, it obviously seemed best just to do away with intents, emotions, and opinions all together. Makes sense, doesn't it?
Here's the catch, though. Many other critics found issue with this method for the sole reason that it's not quite possible to evaluate a text without utilizing some of your own emotions and experiences. It's like trying to take out your brain and heart and then going:
Citations:
Let me break it down for you. When reading a piece of literature from a New Criticism stand point, reader and author go out the window. Author's biography? Irrelevant. Your emotional response to the work? Useless. The intent that the writer had when he created wrote the piece? Who cares! What really matters is the actual writing and what can be gotten from that. Tools such as denotations, connotations, etymology, and symbolism are a New Critic's best friend.
This may leave you wondering, though, where a New Critic gets the right to say your opinion doesn't matter. Well, here's how it is; according to New Criticism, authors don't always plan or even understand their work. Therefore, whatever the author intended the meaning to be doesn't necessarily mean that's what they ended up with. A piece of writing could be seen one way by one person, yet mean something completely different to someone else. When emotions come into play, it's impossible to settle on one single meaning of a text. Taking this into consideration, it obviously seemed best just to do away with intents, emotions, and opinions all together. Makes sense, doesn't it?
Here's the catch, though. Many other critics found issue with this method for the sole reason that it's not quite possible to evaluate a text without utilizing some of your own emotions and experiences. It's like trying to take out your brain and heart and then going:
It just doesn't quite work.
So while the New Critics are off evaluating texts without any of their own input or allowing any input from the author, there are others who are still out there trying to find meaning without having to perform a self-surgery first. What do you think? Could you evaluate a piece of writing without allowing any of your own emotions to influence your findings in the meaning? How do you think this would be beneficial and how might it be a hindrance?
On the bright side, you've officially learned your first theory. I won't even deduct points if you let your emotions determine some of the meaning.
Citations:
"Heart." Heart. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Sept. 2015.
"283 The, Human, Body Free Images." The, Human, Body. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Sept. 2015.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)